Posts Tagged ‘nfl’

Chad Ochocinco and the NFLPA’s influence on the MLS


2011
03.23

I wrote to a friend my thoughts on Chad Ochocinco’s tryout with Sporting KC.  Read the article I link to in the previous sentence first, or you won’t know what I’m talking about.

Here’s what I wrote back to my friend, unedited:

“soccer shape” I assume means cutting a few pounds.  It’s interesting.  I don’t think it’s that funny, but I think it’s serious…I mean, as serious as sports go, you know.  It could be a big interest boost for the MLS if he makes it, but at the same time, it could be a big legitimacy loss.  I think since I’m torn between the two I can’t find it funny.
Just sorta thinking “out loud” for the rest of this…

The other thing about it is just that the lockout in general could be huge for the MLS.  Even if a an eighth of NFL fans decide to tune into the MLS (and not just 85) it’ll be fantastic for the MLS.  One of the problems MLS has is name recognition.  Messi vs. Jeff Cunningham.  Ronaldo vs. Josh Saunders.  If some of the guys that like soccer but don’t watch MLS give it the time to learn some names and become fans we’re talking about years of good the lockout could do for the MLS.  Once those eighth watch, ESPN gives it more coverage and thus more fans.I think the NFL is probably going to work it out though.  There’s too much money to be lost.  Maybe the thought of it will get people to start the MLS season so they know what’s going on in the fall.  I think that number is going to be very small, but with the MLS’ TV numbers right now even ~40,000 would be significant.

Yet another thing could be that Ochocinco discoveries how little the MLS players make.  He’s not one not to make a fuss.  Particularly with the eye on the NFLPA, the MLSPA could gain a lot by 85 being around.
I doubt he’ll be on the team Saturday when they play Chicago.  Maybe though.  Game time is 15:00 Central.  Whether he’ll make the team eventually I’m not sure.  His touch can’t be that great, but if he can head a ball he’s got some ups.  If he can get some good through balls there’s only so many times you can goof up a 1v1.  It all just remains to be seen.

I hope he makes it.  But I hope he’s legit.  I don’t want him to make it and it be a joke.

Remember When Aaron Rodgers Was Picked by the Packers?


2011
02.06
Aaron Rodgers photo by Chad Davis

Aaron Rodgers photo by Chad Davis

We are only a few hours away from the biggest football game of the season. Living in Wisconsin, the mood is high and the Facebook comments of “Go Pack” are more than evident. We are all behind our team, but more important, we are all behind our team leader – Aaron Rodgers.

That wasn’t always the case.

Let’s flash back about 5 1/2 years ago. NFL draft. Aaron, who just came out of the University of California, was expected to take the number one spot in the draft. The 49ers had first pick that year and the Packers were 24th.

San Fransisco didn’t want their college brother. They decided to go with Alex Smith. Not a bad choice, but it was really confusing. Later we found out that Smith was picked because then coach Mike Nolan didn’t think Rodgers would fit with the team.

Too bad for the 49ers.

Still, Rodgers was a good pick. Only problem is nobody really needed a quarterback that year. In all reality, the Green Bay Packers didn’t need Rodgers, either. We had Brett Favre. Yet, come the Packers pick – 24th overall pick – Ted Thompson and Mike Sherman picked Aaron Rodgers.

And we all sat there wondering why.

We had a quarterback – A good one, at that. We didn’t really need another one. We needed a defense at the time. We needed a good Running back. Almost every postition but Quarterback was needed.

Still, we sat in puzzlement and watched as the young QB from California was selected. We then picked up Safety Nick Collins and Wide Receivers Jerome Matthis and Terrance Murphy (overlooking Marion Barber, BTW). Finally, Brady Poppinga  was selected and we started to feel a little better on the picks.

Question: What were your thoughts when the Packers picked Aaron Rodgers in the 2005 Draft?

It was a tough season for this kid. Being in the shadow of Brett Favre – the Quarterback who wouldn’t die – had to have been both an honor and a curse. Yet Rodgers continued on and stayed the backup QB to the historic franchise. He did get up to $24 million for doing that, though.

When he did get a chance to play, we saw something different. I remember two instances he got the opportunity to lead the team, it turned bad, as he was hurt in those games. The second time was his foot, which really put the Pack in a questionable position, since we really didn’t have a good 3rd string QB and Brett was experiencing injuries of his own. That was the first time Favre was questioning retirement (which he ended up not taking, but making us wait for months to announce).

Changing of the Guard

When Rodgers took over the 2008 season, it was shrouded in controversy. Brett tried to come back real late in the game, but was told that the team was centered around their new head QB – Aaron Rodgers. Favre could come back as a back-up, but the fight ensued and he was traded to the New York  Jets.

That had to have been a great boost of confidence for young Rodgers. He basically ousted the King of the hill. Now he had to prove he was the new King.

And that, he did.

We still had our doubts. When he sprained his shoulder, the mood was that Rodgers was going to be one of those injury prone Quarterbacks. But he wasn’t. All of a sudden, things started to change and we really saw the QB in him.

Let’s take a step back for a second to make a clarification: Although as Packer fans we doubted a bit about his longevity, we did know that Rodgers was one hell of a Quarterback. We knew that he had a better arm than Brett Favre and threw smarter, which resulted in less interceptions. He could also run the ball and knew how to scramble – and even get first downs himself – if needed.

Now – Jump to 2009 season. The QB with a $65 million deal to 2014 was really starting to play. He was a Pro Bowler that year, behind Brett Favre and Drew Brees. Yet, Brees was in the Superbowl, so he bowed out and Favre was injured, so he bowed out. That made Rodgers the starting QB for the NFC. Not a great way to do it, but it is what it is.

Then came the 2010 season. An amazing one at that. The Packers were expected to be in the Superbowl this year. Last time that expectation was pronounced, we did go – and won – the Superbowl.

However, the first part of the 2010 season was not promising. Loosing key players and losing games started to dash the hopes of the fans. Come the bye-week, we were pretty much written off.

But something happened. It’s like a spring flower that finds it’s way through the snowbank to bloom. That is what the Packers did. Bloomed.

With Aaron Rodgers at the helm, we were a team that couldn’t be stopped in the second half of the season. The comeback kids.

Then, another setback as Rodgers got a concussion. Out for the game. But in steps another talented QB in Matt Flynn. Although he didn’t win the game, we felt a vote of confidence that didn’t rail us from the idea we could still make it.

By the next week, Rodgers was back and we, as a group of fans, were hoping and praying. Crossing our fingers that we still had a chance…

The Dream approaches

So now we are here after all odds have knocked us out. It’s a long way from 2005 when we were sitting there scratching our heads to a Quarterback choice. Now, hours before the game – 5 years later – we can see clearly why Aaron Rodgers was picked.

So whatever happens at Superbowl XLV, we know many people have really helped us get there. Ted Thompson and Mike Sherman, Alex Smith (who helped in the mathematics for us to play the Seahawks in the Playoffs), to Nick Collins and Brad Poppinga, who are still on this Superbowl team. Thanks even to Brett Favre who tried to keep our new star Quarterback down. When we took the two wins from the Vikings this year, that is when Packer fans knew it was time for the new era.

So with that, I say “Go Pack, Go!” The game is expected to be one of the best Superbowls ever. We will know the answer very soon.

But more important, thank you Aaron Rodgers, for sticking with a team that put you on the back burner for so long. When you had your chance to shine, you became the brightest star out there.

NFL Pre-Season and “Winter Break”


2010
08.24

I’m still officially on hiatus, but I couldn’t help but comment on this NY Times article about the NFL. As you know, I’m not an NFL guy, but I’ve been interested in this move to the 18-game season.

Let me talk about something first to set the stage for my discussion on the NFL. Skip to the end if you don’t want to read my soccer mumbo-jumbo. :)

The EPL (English Premier League), or BPL (Barclay’s Premier League) as I’ve been hearing it called for the first times recently, has this type of discussion all the time. The next few sentences here are simply back-story, but stick with me. The German League has 18 teams in it, which cuts out 4 games. The Spanish League has 20 teams, but has only one domestic cup. The Italian League has two domestic cups and 20 teams in the league. The French League also is a 20 and 2. I’m not going to pretend to know if there is talk of shortening the season in France or Italy, but the argument against Italy could certainly be that the weather is better there than in the English (and Wales*…which is probably why BPL is catching on). The same could be said for France, though not to the degree of Italy.

The Germans have a winter break with their four games and one cup removed from the schedule. Many want a winter break in England (and Wales, let’s not forget them). I’m not sure about other leagues with winter breaks. Some leagues, such as my beloved Fotbollsallsvenskan take off the entire winter, but that’s not what we are talking about here. We’re talking about taking December off, or something like that.

Here’s where we bring it all back to the NFL…the EPL/BPL has the same problem the NFL does. Christmas games are a big deal in England, and doing away with that would destroy traditions.

I realize people are resistant to change, but there’s no reason change has to destroy *important* traditions. I’d claim there’s a difference in “the way things have always been done” and a true tradition. True tradition has emotional value and not just stick-in-the-mud resistance to change.

Let’s assume we stick with 16 games in the NFL. If you don’t see where I’m going yet – the NFL could have some sort of winter break. I’d suggest in between Thanksgiving and Christmas for both the EPL and NFL. That way Christmas and Thanksgiving games could be held. Maybe between Black Friday and Christmas Eve. Let everyone do their shopping, watch basketball and hockey, spend time with their family, study for exams and anything else that a human might do when it’s not NFL season. Give the players some time to rest and come back refreshed so we can watch the best of the best battle it out for the playoff spots. No one likes it when their team is put out because of an injury…except the team that takes their place and even then there’s always that nagging “well if Joe Montana [or whoever] hadn’t gotten hurt…” The same, of course, is true of the EPL, though their season extends to May and not the first weekend in February. The EPL has the additional problem of having to deal with the World Cup every four years (and continental competitions every 2), but that’s neither here nor there. What the EPL does only moderately affects us in the US as there are only a handful of US internationals playing in the league and game times are early enough on Saturdays as to be a royal pain and the others are during the work day.

The NFL would have to work out at what week to start the break. This year Thanksgiving is week 12. That seems a little late. I’m not going to go into the options in detail, but the season could be moved into August to give the southern teams the advantage the northern teams have in the winter. Then the break could be between the playoffs and the season. This is essentially what happens in college football (well, division I-AA conferences without a conference championship, anyway). The other option is to move it to week 10. Both of those have advantages and disadvantages. If there’s a lot of feedback, maybe I’ll spend some time going through those, but for now, it’s just something to ponder.

When it’s all said and done, what could be better than a Super Bowl in late February, followed by March Madness, followed by NBA and NHL playoff pushes and then playoffs? All this and you still get to see Thanksgiving and Christmas games and spend some time with your family.

*Scotland has it’s own, well-respected league. Northern Ireland has a less-respected league (to be honest, I wasn’t even sure they had a league until doing a little research!).


Switch to our mobile site